Sunday, September 18, 2005

John Roberts

Although I am mostly just thanking my lucky stars that Bush II did something moderate for once, I read an interesting critique of Mister Roberts this weekend. Although Roe versus Wade being overturned is what gets everybody's panties knotted up (which is odd because I am pretty sure it still would be 5-4 even if 2 pro-lifers are put on), Roberts has some very conservative views about the powers of a president. Depending on how you look it, we have either placed more checks on a president since Vietnam/Watergate or we have eroded the powers of the president since then. It appears Roverts is in the latter camp.
He has worked under both Reagan and Bush #1 and wrote various memos protecting presidential aggression; for example saying it was okay to send troops to Grenada without declaring war. Now, he was just doing his job at the time, but he's made other recent troubling decisions like saying Cheney had the right to not disclose any records from his energy task force meetings and being on the 3-judge panel that okayed the Guatanamo militatary commissions (that allowed evidence under coercion, gave no appeal process, and stated that violations of the Geneva Convention are international issues not eligible for lawsuits). Dubya + Roberts + possibly Gonzales could make for some scary future abuses of the War on terror. Stay tuned.

3 Comments:

Anonymous Anonymous said...

My question is, does he have tatoos? If so, I'm against him.

6:44 pm  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

How can I get a no credit check loan? Wow, chuck daddy is there anything you can't do? As a woman I am deeply offended by anyone who would put legislation in place to restrict my right to choose. Do we really want more back alley abortions and unwanted pregnancies?

7:52 pm  
Blogger chuckdaddy2000 said...

I agree that electing a judge that would roll back Roe versus Wade would be a very bad thing (and political suicide). But I don't think the next 2 selections' views on it will matter. Stevens, Souter, Ginsberg, and Breyer will never recall it, and Kennedy, the wild card, voted to reaffirm it in 1992's Planned Parenthood v. Casey. I think it would be much better that we select a judge in support, nevertheless since it doesn't appear that it Roe will be overruled, we should be very careful in overfocusing; there are many other important issues that also need attention.

9:33 pm  

Post a Comment

<< Home